01
Establish factual confidence
TIS distinguishes known, probable, uncertain, and unknown claims using sources, contradictions, bias, and missing context.
EthosGate evaluates truth, human autonomy, and societal impact before AI systems act. When the stakes rise, it makes the ethical state visible, reviewable, and accountable.
Intelligence proposes. Conscience evaluates. The agent acts only after both.
TIS
0.87
Truth Integrity Score
HAI
0.91
Human Autonomy Index
SRQ
0.76
Societal Resonance Quotient
Rodić Principle
C(t) = [TIS(t), HAI(t), SRQ(t)]
Ethical state evaluation
Corpus provenance preserved
01 / The system
EthosGate is designed to intervene before consequential output, tool use, or multi-agent execution. It asks whether an action is true enough, preserves human choice, and remains defensible beyond the immediate task.
01
TIS distinguishes known, probable, uncertain, and unknown claims using sources, contradictions, bias, and missing context.
02
HAI tests for coercion, manipulation, dignity, alternatives, and the ability for authorized people to override a system.
03
SRQ evaluates harm, fairness, affected third parties, and long-term societal effects before execution.
02 / Accountability
A hash-chained ethical audit trail preserves the request, context, scores, uncertainty, alternatives, decision, and rationale—so supervision is not silently erased after execution.
Explore the foundation03 / Decision spectrum
Green
Allow
Yellow
Modify
Orange
Review
Red
Refuse
High uncertainty and material conflicts are escalated rather than hidden behind a confident answer.
The Conscience by Design corpus remains the primary normative source for consequential evaluations.
Human life, dignity, autonomy, truthfulness, accountability, and harm prevention are not optimization tradeoffs.
Conscience by design